The World Climate Simulation Program (a model UNFCCC/COP), which has been regularly organized in various parts of the world, was conducted by the Change for Climate Project (C4C) under the leadership of Oğuz Tosun (the World Climate Ambassador of Turkey), with the support of Climate Interactive and the United States Embassy. This program was held for the sixth time in Ankara, Turkey.

Young people from different provinces and universities in the country participated in the program, which included simulations and theoretical inputs. Nowadays, we feel and witness the impacts of climate change and global warming, which brings to mind how valuable the efforts for this program are.

COP

In the program, Ülkem Yararbaş and Emre Göktepe from the Association of System Thinking in Education (Eğitimde Sistem Düşüncesi Derneği) informed the participants about the theory behind system thinking. Apart from hosting the World Climate Simulation, the World Energy Simulation was also held for the first time in Turkey. As a journalist in the World Climate Simulation, I am authorized to share the media report here:

Opening Speech of the UN Secretary-General                                                 

The UN Secretary-General opened the 2017 Climate Negotiations with his opening speech. In his speech, the Secretary-General emphasized that the time is running out for both people and nature. Thereby, he urged the representatives of countries and negotiating blocs to take necessary steps immediately. While he was ending his speech, he reminded everyone that the decisions they make today will affect future generations.

Negotiations, Day 1

Negotiations on the first day were quite tense. Countries and blocs were distant from the diplomatic style of negotiations. The United States (US) and the European Union (EU) were faced with heavy criticism. Their contribution to the Green Climate Fund and Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) were not considered genuine or trustworthy. Also, the US, China, and the EU seemed to be immovable in trying to reach an agreement. The EU promised to deliver a part of fossil fuel taxes into the Green Climate Fund if the US and China supported the idea by conducting the same strategy. On the other hand, the bloc of Developing Countries took attention with their significant raise in ambition. They demanded other countries and blocs to put in more effort in order to reach a better position in relation to climate justice. The results according to the proposals of countries were not as expected at the end of first day. +3.8 degrees of temperature rise was determined in respect to countries and blocs’ proposals to their INDCs. The Secretary-General, again, urged the parties to put forth more effort.

Special Notes from Day 1

  • An activist group made their first visit to EU and specifically criticized China. 
  • The EU presented undemonstrative attitudes during the day. 
  • Fossil of the Day Award went to the Developing Countries.
  • Climate change impacts, such as inundation of islands and climate refugees could not be completely solved.

Negotiations, Day 2

Day 2 started with protest by activist groups. Slogans such as “Attention, we are melting” and “The ones who create problems cannot solve these problems,” were echoed in the negotiation rooms. The Parties started their speeches after the protests. Day 2 was like Day 1, as it remained weak for solving climate problems. Necessary steps could not be taken. The parties accused each other rather than searching for ways to cooperate. Representatives of the Developing Countries rebuked the rest of the Parties. They indicated that although the weakest circle is the developing countries, other countries and blocs do not adequately contribute to the process and give unrealistic promises, which remained at the very low levels. At the end of the day, one of the important criticisms was stated by the EU which indicated that each Party talked about money but no one proposed how to use this money. During Day 2, one of the observations was that the countries and blocs acted in accordance with their own interests instead of a collective interest. Nevertheless, +3.8 degrees was decreased to +3.5 degrees in accordance with the analysis of the proposals of countries and blocs at the end of Day 2. Preserving temperature rise under +2 degrees as a target was still far away and current conditions would keep influencing all living creatures.

Special Notes from Day 2

  • Activists’ protests throughout the day took attention.
  • Fossil of the Day Award: the US

Negotiations, Day 3

After two disappointing days, Day 3 was a good day for possible collaborations. The countries and blocs were calm and presented reasonable proposals compared to previous days. Rather than accusing each other, the Parties were more creative and expressed their tendency towards possible collaborations. A surprising proposal of the US was about 45 billion dollars as its national contribution. Nevertheless, the US created disappointment as it did not give satisfying explanations for its close relationships with fossil fuel industry. The star of Day 3 was renewable energy. The Parties seemed to be agreed on the advantage of investment in renewable energy but they were not clear about how to invest in it. This uncertainty allowed the fossil fuel lobby to accelerate its campaigns and try to take advantage of unemployment problems of the countries and blocs.

Special Notes from Day 3

  • The video which shows secret talks between activist groups and the fossil fuel lobby was leaked.
  • China made efforts to have close contact with other Parties.
  • The Developing Countries maintained their strong stance.

Negotiations, Day 4

Day 4 was the day for the foundation of various collaborations. It was heard backstage that the US and China agreed on specific dates to start preventing and decreasing their carbon emissions. The active position of the fossil fuel lobby was another issue to mobilize the backstage. Activist groups remained passive at this point while fossil fuel actors were actively lobbying. The Parties delivered their final speeches and presented final proposals for their contribution. The focus of Parties was again on the importance of investment in renewable energy on the last day. The stars of the last day became China, India, and the bloc of the Developed Countries while the US, the EU, and the bloc of the Developing Countries were faced with criticism by various actors. 

Special Notes from Day 4 

  • Media presented criticism from the international community towards the US and the EU
  • Temperature rise was decreased to +3.0 degrees. Although there is no major improvement, it was still possible to obtain some small achievements since the Paris Agreement. However, the Secretary-General emphasized that there was still a long way to go.
  • Fossil of the Day Award: Developing Countries

The organizing team and participants succeeded in implementing four fictional days of the World Climate Simulation within a day. While the organization team was happy to see concrete results of the program, the participants enjoyed discussions in the simulations and have contributed to the future of world climate negotiations, by experience.

Now, the turn for contribution is yours, as Climate Trackers. The participants turned back to their homes and started working on the implementation of new simulations. Dates for these simulations have not been decided yet but they are planned to be organized in October-November-December (2017). Thereby, I suggest you follow the social media accounts of the Change for Climate Project (C4C). It is the time for change. Not the climate, but ourselves, our families, our friends, our society, our country, and companies – by a just transition.

Baris Can Sever

About Baris Can Sever

Barış Can Sever recently completed his Masters Degree in International Relations at Yasar University. He has been writing columns since 2013 as a volunteer journalist. He was also one of the coordinators in the LearningMedia project which was funded by the cooperation of European Union and Turkey.